← All topics

Stock Market · Mutual funds, deeper

Direct vs regular plans

Every mutual fund offers two versions: Direct and Regular. They invest in identical underlying stocks but have different costs. The difference compounds into huge sums over time.

The structural difference

Same fund manager, same stocks, same NAV calculation. Only the expense ratio differs.

The math

Regular plan expense ratio: 1.5% per year

Direct plan expense ratio: 0.5% per year

Difference: 1.0% per year

Over 25 years on a ₹10 lakh investment:

[bars:Direct (0.5%)=95 L|Regular (1.5%)=76 L]

> The ₹19 lakh difference is what you paid your distributor for 'service', usually a few WhatsApp messages and basic recommendations.

Where to buy direct plans

When regular might make sense

So the question isn't which plan is better in the abstract. It's whether you're getting ₹19 lakh of service. If someone is genuinely rebalancing your portfolio and stopping you from panic-selling in a crash, that's worth paying for. If the relationship is a few WhatsApp messages a year, you're funding it either way.

Takeaway. Direct plans run 0.5-1.5% cheaper than regular plans, which compounds to roughly 25% more wealth over 25 years. That gap is the price of the distributor. Worth paying only if the distributor is doing work you would otherwise pay for separately.

Reading is step one. Playing is how it sticks.

Get a virtual net worth and live this exact concept in daily scenarios. ₹0 real risk.

Play it free →

Education, not investment advice. MarketPlay is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. Figures as of July 2026. Terms · Privacy